In the face of Nigeria’s soaring inflation reaching 32.70 per cent and the consequent reduction in food intake, a recent study published in Nature might offer a glimmer of hope. The paper, titled “Dietary restriction impacts health and lifespan of genetically diverse mice,” suggests that reduced calorie intake could potentially extend lifespan.  

This research comes at a time when many Nigerians are grappling with economic constraints that inadvertently impose a form of dietary restriction upon them. Imposed or not, eating less now could just be an investment into the future of those who are particular about living on earth for very long.

Finding what works starts with the study in question delving into the effects of caloric reduction on a group of mice with varied genetic backgrounds. It found that, overall, a lower calorie diet was associated with a longer lifespan in these mice.

Sadly, but maybe fortunately, the current situation in Nigeria, where many individuals are consuming fewer meals due to the economic downturn provides the natural conditioning for any caloric control. While the circumstances are far from ideal, this involuntary shift towards reduced consumption of meals could, in theory, have unexpected health benefits.

ALSO READ: What the life expectancy of an average Nigerian will be 25 years from now

It’s important to note, however, that the relationship between dietary restriction and health is complex. The study highlighted that the benefits of a reduced-calorie diet can vary widely and are influenced by factors such as genetics and the body’s resilience to stress. For Nigerians, whose diets are being restricted not by choice but by necessity, the key to harnessing the potential benefits of this situation may lie in the balance and quality of the limited food they can access.

Moreover, the study underscores the significance of genetics in determining the impact of dietary restriction on health and lifespan. This raises questions about the applicability of the findings to humans, who are genetically more diverse than the mice used in the study.

Nevertheless, the research provides valuable insights into how caloric restriction could be a double-edged sword, offering benefits to longevity while also presenting challenges to maintaining overall health and vitality.

The idea that eating less could lead to a longer life might seem counterintuitive. Yet, if the findings of the Nature study hold true for humans, this could mean that the current adversity has a potential upside. It suggests that a moderate level of calorie restriction, one that does not lead to malnutrition or significant weight loss, might be the optimal approach for enhancing lifespan without compromising health.

Even if the situation is what it is, it is still crucial to focus on the nutritional value of the available food and to strive for a diet that supports both immediate needs and long-term health. 

Public health departments, federal or sub-nationals may take a cue from this. They may see reasons for a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between diet, genetics, and health, and target it with policies that support the nutritional well-being of the population during economic crises.

Meiza Nigeria