Nigeria grows rice, yet ships dock daily with foreign rice. In the same way, Nigeria harvests tomatoes, yet factories import tomato paste. Nigeria pumps crude oil, yet pays heavily for imported refined fuel.

On paper, this should not make sense. In reality, it is the structure of the Nigerian economy.

According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria’s total imports consistently run into the tens of billions of dollars annually, with food and manufactured goods accounting for a significant share. At the same time, the country remains one of Africa’s largest producers of several agricultural commodities. The contradiction is not about the absence of production. It is about scale, quality, infrastructure and value addition.

Take rice, for example. The Food and Agriculture Organisation ranks Nigeria among Africa’s largest rice producers, with output estimated at over 8 million metric tonnes in recent years. Yet the country still imports rice to close a supply gap driven by population growth, post-harvest losses and processing limitations. Local milling capacity has improved, but not enough to eliminate dependence on imports entirely.

The tomato story is even more striking. Nigeria is one of the largest producers of tomatoes in sub-Saharan Africa. However, the Central Bank of Nigeria has previously disclosed that the country spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually importing tomato paste. A major reason is the lack of adequate processing plants and cold chain systems. Large volumes of fresh tomatoes spoil before they reach factories. What is produced on farms does not fully translate into what appears on supermarket shelves.

Then there is oil. Nigeria is Africa’s biggest crude oil producer and a leading member of OPEC. Yet for years, the country relied heavily on imported refined petroleum products because domestic refineries operated far below capacity. This meant exporting crude and importing petrol, diesel and aviation fuel at higher prices. It is a value chain imbalance that has cost the economy billions in foreign exchange.

Production is not the same as value addition

Infrastructure is at the heart of the issue. According to the World Bank, Nigeria’s logistics and transport bottlenecks significantly increase the cost of moving goods from farms to markets and from factories to ports. Poor storage facilities lead to post-harvest losses estimated in some studies at up to 30 percent for perishable crops. Electricity shortages further raise production costs for manufacturers, making imported finished goods sometimes cheaper than locally made alternatives.

Also Read: Borrowing costs could ease as CBN cuts interest

There is also the question of standards and consumer preference. Imported goods often arrive processed, packaged and branded to meet international quality benchmarks. Local producers, especially small and medium enterprises, struggle with financing and technology gaps that limit their ability to compete at scale.

Trade policy plays its own role. Over the years, Nigeria has moved back and forth between restricting imports and opening up the market. Border closures, foreign exchange restrictions and import bans have been used to encourage local production. However, without real improvements in infrastructure and industrial capacity, these restrictions alone cannot eliminate imports.

The picture that emerges is not simply one of dependency. It is one of structural imbalance. Nigeria produces raw materials in significant quantities, but the systems required to process, store, refine and distribute them efficiently remain underdeveloped.

Meiza Nigeria