Price stability is emerging as one of the earliest casualties of Nigeria’s newly implemented tax reforms, not because the policy has imposed fresh burdens, but because fear, confusion, and deliberate misinterpretation have filtered into the market faster than official clarification.

Less than two weeks after the new tax framework took effect on January 1, signs of unintended consequences are already evident. Businesses and traders across the country have begun passing on arbitrary price increases to consumers, triggering public backlash and raising concerns about how uncertainty is distorting market behaviour.

The reform, designed to harmonise taxes, expand exemptions for low-income earners and small businesses, and reduce corporate tax rates by up to 30 percent, is instead being cited as justification for higher prices on everyday goods and services, even in cases where no new tax obligation exists.

Across major commercial centres, traders and service providers have introduced value-added tax charges or unnamed levies on transactions, often without explanation. In Lagos, residents say POS operators have increased withdrawal charges, while retailers have added extra costs to routine purchases under the guise of tax compliance.

On social media, consumers have shared multiple accounts of vendors demanding additional payments labelled as tax or VAT, including instances where shoppers were asked to pay significantly more than the listed prices of goods. Analysts warn that such practices, if left unchecked, could suppress consumer spending and deepen economic strain.

Market-level price increases are already being recorded. Traders at Oshodi market report higher costs for food items, POS withdrawals and fuel purchases, attributing the changes to confusion around the new tax framework. Observers note that many of the affected goods remain tax-exempt, suggesting that opportunistic pricing rather than statutory obligations is driving the increases.

The trend is not limited to informal markets. In upscale establishments, diners have reported inflated bills attributed to a new government tax policy, while online videos show vendors adding hundreds of thousands of naira to high-value transactions and describing the surcharges as VAT, despite the absence of clear legal justification.

Beyond consumer prices, investment professionals are raising concerns about the reforms’ potential impact on capital formation and investor confidence, particularly regarding capital gains taxation. Analysts note that while similar taxes exist in advanced economies, Nigeria’s higher risk profile and weaker institutional safeguards may make the framework less attractive to both local and foreign investors.

Also Read: New tax law in Nigeria: Why transfer narrations are suddenly non-negotiable

Market data underscores this sensitivity. Despite recording strong gains in 2025, the Nigerian Exchange experienced a sharp sell-off in November, wiping off ₦6.5 trillion in market value amid uncertainty over capital gains taxation. Investment analysts argue that the scale of the reaction suggests that policy ambiguity, rather than the tax rate itself, was the primary trigger.

Some corporate actions have also been interpreted as precautionary responses, with reports of major deals being concluded earlier than planned to avoid potential exposure under the new tax regime.

Professional services firms have identified technical gaps in the framework that may be fuelling misinterpretation. These include the absence of inflation adjustment in capital gains taxation, unclear thresholds for indirect share transfers, restrictions on foreign exchange deductions tied to official rates, and provisions that disallow expense deductions where VAT has not been charged by suppliers.

According to analysts, these gaps could increase business costs, discourage investment and prolong market volatility if not addressed promptly.

In response, promoters of the reforms have maintained that much of the criticism stems from misunderstanding policy intent. They argue that capital gains tax is not a flat 30 percent that most investors qualify for exemptions or reinvestment reliefs, and that foreign exchange deduction restrictions are deliberate measures aimed at supporting monetary stability.

They have also acknowledged implementation challenges, noting that clerical inconsistencies and cross-referencing gaps are being identified and corrected.

Economic analysts caution, however, that without swift public clarification and enforcement, opportunistic behaviour may continue to drive what they describe as second-hand inflation, where prices rise regardless of actual tax liability.

As Nigeria rolls out one of its most ambitious fiscal reforms in decades, the widening gap between policy intent and market reaction highlights a familiar risk that misinterpretation and exploitation, rather than the law itself, may end up doing the greatest damage to price stability.

Meiza Nigeria